亚星游戏官网-yaxin222

门户 | 手机客户端 | 论坛 | 人才 | 百科 | 搜索 | 技术问答 | English
已解决问题
看了很长时间的LTE加密,发现一个问题
提问者:630053570   |  提问时间:2011-12-15 21:18
UE在进行attach request时,向MME发送的UE security capability竟然支撑空的加密和完整性保护算法,这是不是意味着UE可以不支撑加密和完整性保护?如果不是这样,那为什么LTE标准会这样考虑,为什么不强制实行加密算法?
Security header type (octet 1)

8 7 6 5
0 0 0 0 Plain NAS message, not security protected

Security protected NAS message:
0 0 0 1 Integrity protected
0 0 1 0 Integrity protected and ciphered
0 0 1 1 Integrity protected with new EPS security context (NOTE 1)
0 1 0 0 Integrity protected and ciphered with new EPS security context (NOTE 2)

Non-standard L3 message:
1 1 0 0 Security header for the SERVICE REQUEST message

1 1 0 1 These values are not used in this version of the protocol.
to If received they shall be interpreted as ‘1100’. (NOTE 3)
1 1 1 1

All other values are reserved.

NOTE 1: This codepoint may be used only for a SECURITY MODE COMMAND message.
NOTE 2: This codepoint may be used only for a SECURITY MODE COMPLETE message.
NOTE 3: When bits 7 and 8 are set to '11', bits 5 and 6 can be used for future extensions of the SERVICE REQUEST message.
回答时间:2011-12-20 11:51
 
我要回应:  回应字数在5000字以内

 

XML 地图 | Sitemap 地图